Be Dog Do Borks Mac OS

Borks

With Apple's popularity at a low, the makers of several classic Mac applications such as FrameMaker and PageMaker declined to develop new versions of their software for Mac OS X. Ars Technica columnist John Siracusa, who reviewed every major OS X release up to 10.10, described the early releases in retrospect as 'dog-slow, feature poor'. Because they're the only game in town for real Mac backup, they don't have to give a damn. There are so many things they could do in the low-end (Express) to make a better product, but instead.

So, Dantz has me annoyed for a number of reasons, not the least of which is their recent policy on Express, summarized as 'We don't want to compete in the consumer backup market, so we're going to throw in the towel and ask Retrospect Express users to Pony up $60 for Desktop'. To be honest, I'm more interested in Prosumer backup than consumer backup, but I figure any consumer who backs up at all qualifies as a prosumer.
Ok, so here are my requirements:

Be Dog Do Borks Mac Os Catalina


  • Must back up to removable hard drives
  • Must be able to restore bootable partitions
  • Must be incremental (only back up files that are needed)
  • Must support versioning (keep old copies of files around)
  • Must be automatic (backup when I'm not around and not logged in)
  • Must be easy (no roll-your-own-shell-script solutions)
  • Must be less than $100
  • nice if it had features like compression, phone support, etc.

Be Dog Do Borks Mac Os 11

Dog

Be Dog Do Borks Mac Os 7


Be Dog Do Borks Mac Os Pro

Retrospect Express can do all these things, and it used to cost $50. I know there are other products on the market that can do this, but I have no experience with them. Does anyone else trust their data to something besides Retrospect that can do all this?